Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED105817

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

DECEMBER 26, 2018

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED105817 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOSEPH DAVIS, APP
  1. ED105843 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANDRE GASKIN, APP
  1. ED106014 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RANDY K. OWEN, APP
  1. ED106015 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RANDY K. OWEN, APP
  1. ED106052 DOUGLAS J. HOWERY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED106056 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RAYMOND ORDOUKHANIAN, APP
  1. ED106124 WILLETTA E TOWNSEND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED106173 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. ALFRED DAVIS III, APP
  1. ED106232 MICHAEL C. SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED106328 PIERRE T. PIPES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED106380 DEBORAH BOCKEY, RES V TIMOTHY RASMUSSEN, APP
  1. ED106441 JANEANE CORRELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED106566 DOVENMUEHLE, APP V UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S,RES
  1. ED106595 NELDA HIGGINS, APP V GERARDO GUTIERREZ M.D., RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion