Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED106766

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

NOVEMBER 12, 2019

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED106766 CORNERSTONE CONDO, RES V ANTOINE DUNLAP, APP
  1. ED106972 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ADAM J. BASLER, APP
  1. ED107190 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RYAN E. CONNER, APP
  1. ED107282 ANTHONY J. LEE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED107326 JOHN L. GIBSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED107327 RICHARD B. CHAMBERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED107396 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN A. BREWER, JR., APP
  1. ED107505 LAURA K. BATES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED107625 JAMIE L. WHITE, RES V JEFFREY L. WHITE, APP
  1. ED107638 MATTHEW M. MILLER, RES V SUSAN M. MILLER, APP
  1. ED107684 TIMOTHY L. BASTIN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED107716 IN THE MATTER OF: W.L.Y.

CORRECTION(S):

  1. ED107749 DAVE CAMPBELL ETAL, APP V WOODLAND LAKES TST, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion