Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD70466

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

DECEMBER 30, 2010 WESTERN DISTRICT SPECIAL HANDDOWN

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD70466 Maurice T. Davis vs. State of Missouri WD71401 Clyde E. Griffin vs. State of Missouri WD71690 Matter of Selena Layana Lauver-Garcia By and through her next friend, Tye Clayton Garcia; Tye Clayton Garcia vs. Anna Lauver (n/k/a Koch) WD71959 James L. Baker vs. State of Missouri WD72339 State of Missouri vs. James J. Hamilton WD72453 Valerie Hatley vs. Division of Employment Security WD72497 James Clark vs. Dave Schreimann, et al. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD70718 State of Missouri vs. Ronald D. Christian WD71682 State of Missouri vs. William W. Elliott ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion