Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD70503

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

OF APRIL 27, 2010 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD70503 Elmer C. Jackson vs. State of Missouri WD70549 Troy J. Daye vs. State of Missouri WD70768 Erma S. McKinney vs. State of Missouri WD71024 John Haidusek vs. Division of Employment Security WD71546 Lisa Marie Morgan vs. Christopher Paul Morgan -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD69576 State of Missouri vs. Myron R. Sanders WD70151 State of Missouri vs. Kenneth Rasmussen WD70348 State of Missouri vs. Sandrio Dejesus-Andujar WD70843 State of Missouri vs. Jerry L. Radley -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion