Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD70652

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

OF APRIL 6, 2010 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD70652 Paul Chokota vs. Independent Photo Art Supply WD70765 Marcus Busey vs. State of Missouri WD70981 Eugene Renfrow, Jr., Michael Renfrow and Linda Kaufman vs. James Renfrow, A Married Person and James Renfrow, Personal Representative in the Estate of Eugene K. Renfrow, Sr., Deceased WD71040 State of Missouri, ex rel. Jeremiah W. Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri vs. Zachary A. Smith WD71149 Consolidated with WD71040 WD71069 Robert Derr Young vs. State of Missouri WD71265 Jeremy Gladden vs. Barbra Gladden -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD69521 State of Missouri vs. Larry Martin WD70182 State of Missouri vs. Mario Alvino Griffith WD70362 State of Missouri vs. Sanrio Dejesus Andujar -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion