Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD71189

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

APRIL 26, 2011 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD71189 Perry L. Lewis vs. State of Missouri WD71752 Anthony L. Jackson vs. State of Missouri WD71906 Johnathan B. Steen vs. State of Missouri WD71936 Mary Margaret Steele vs. Alan Edward Steele WD72108 Belle Wilson, et al. vs. Jay Mohn, et al. WD72361 Raymond Grossich vs. State of Missouri WD72660 Dana F. Stevens vs. Erroll B. Stevens WD72902 Lisa Bajema vs. Division of Employment Security WD72927 Kathleen R. Siska vs. Division of Employment Security WD72749 Franklin Ashley vs. State of Missouri ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD70867 State of Missouri vs. Craig Dion Coward WD71367 State of Missouri vs. Randy Ralstin WD71540 State of Missouri vs. Marcus N. Mitchell WD71968 State of Missouri vs. Nonley L. Maxwell, Jr. WD72118 State of Missouri vs. Marlon E. Lewis ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion