Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD71628

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

NOVEMBER 16, 2010 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD71628 Timothy E. Siela vs. State of Missouri WD71982 Rolf A. Rosendahl vs. Missouri Dept. of Revenue WD72278 Zackery Moore vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri; Division of Employment Security WD72426 Arnetta Bland vs. Division of Employment Security WD72740 David R. Bullock vs. Jay Nixon, et al. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD70815 State of Missouri vs. Michelle Lee Smith WD71305 State of Missouri vs. David C. Walton WD71563 State of Missouri vs. Joshua Allen Turner WD71712 City of Kansas City, Missouri vs. Amos A. Aggabao ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion