Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD72163

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

FEBRUARY 28, 2012 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD72163 Brandon Seaton vs. State of Missouri WD73180 Ozie Banks, III vs. State of Missouri WD73324 Ernest L. Hines vs. State of Missouri WD73366 Elijah Zakka vs. State of Missouri WD73408 Cody N. Wolfram vs. State of Missouri WD73516 Eskew R. Jackson, III vs. State of Missouri WD73570 In the Interest of: B.R.B., Plaintiff; B.B. & K.B. vs. J.S. & K.S. WD73933 Chasity J. Brandon (Resa) vs. Carry L. Brandon WD74010 Michael A. Brown vs. State of Missouri

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD73399 State of Missouri vs. J.D.H. WD73574 State of Missouri vs. Greg G. Laucks WD73686 State of Missouri vs. Joseph L. Loucks WD73753 State of Missouri vs. Candice Irene Rohling WD74597 Consolidated with WD73753

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion