Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD73389

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

JANUARY 31, 2012 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD73389 Timothy D. Thompson vs. State of Missouri WD73430 David A. Dossett, Jr. vs. Patrick W. Peters WD73515 Raymond A. Brown vs. State of Missouri WD73783 Alexander R. Young vs. State of Missouri WD73795 Ray Anthony Rollins vs. Missouri Department of Corrections WD74019 In the Interest of: A.A.C.; Juvenile Officer; Missouri Children's Division vs. R.C.C. (Father) WD74109 In the Interest of; A.M.; Juvenile Officer vs. R.M. (Mother)

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD72258 State of Missouri vs. Gregory A. Lee WD72893 State of Missouri vs. Heath L. Calfee WD73041 State of Missouri vs. Phillip R. Creason WD73073 State of Missouri vs. Larry Jones WD73252 State of Missouri vs. David R. Wunder WD73338 State of Missouri vs. Robert A. Williams WD73515 Raymond A. Brown vs. State of Missouri

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion