Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD75764

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar insurance bad faith issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

JANUARY 28, 2014 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WD75764 Stacy Holmquest vs. State of Missouri WD75860 Christopher R. Ellis vs. State of Missouri WD76194 Leola McGhee Crockett vs. Division of Employment Security WD76211 Julie A. Loveall vs. John Correa WD76224 Allstate Insurance Company vs. Rondi S. Miller WD76532 Arlando Naylor vs. Missouri Department of Corrections

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WD74199 State of Missouri vs. Steven Robert Stansberry WD75351 State of Missouri vs. Michael Henry Hudson WD75604 State of Missouri vs. Aaron John Hansberry WD75925 State of Missouri vs. Gerald A. Green WD76039 State of Missouri vs. Andre M. Broadus

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion