Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD78613

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

HANDDOWN LIST OF OCTOBER 25, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WD78613 Vince C. Frazier vs. State of Missouri WD78677 Jerry Jay Swartz vs. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri WD78866 Dino Chavez Anderson vs. State of Missouri WD79018 George Fuller vs. Raymond Sego WD79022 Philip T. Yates vs. Director of Revenue

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WD78453 State of Missouri vs. Michael J. Gann WD78589 State of Missouri vs. Richard Anderson Preston, Jr. WD78836 State of Missouri vs. Darrell L. Perry WD78923 State of Missouri vs. Tylor J.C. Bradley

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion