Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD80079

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

HANDDOWN LIST OF DECEMBER 26, 2017

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WD80079 David C. Rechtien and Christine A. Rechtien, et al vs. Michael C. Cooper WD80541 In the Interest of: A.R.R. and D.A.M.R.; Juvenile Officer, vs. M.L.R., Sr. (Father) WD80567 Consolidated with WD80541 WD80604 Janell Bisson vs. Shane Bisson WD80694 In the Interest of: T.R.A.-M., A.F.A. & A.J.A.; Juvenile Officer, Department of Social Services, Children's Division vs. A.M.M. WD80713 Andrew N. Flowers vs. Aaron Jill Flowers

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WD79592 State of Missouri vs. David L. McCannon WD79667 State of Missouri vs. Joey L. Tackett WD80096 State of Missouri vs. Lewis E. Ford

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion