OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED90047

Opinion

JANUARY 20, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED90047 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BRYAN SIMPSON, APP
  1. ED90331 IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN HINES
  1. ED90581 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KEVIN HARMAN, APP
  1. ED90667 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V GARY BORDEN, APP
  1. ED90809 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KYLE SHORT, APP
  1. ED90831 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHON W. ESPOSITO, APP
  1. ED90871 KEVIN W HAMMERSCHMIDT, APP V STATE OF MO, RES
  1. ED90996 SCOTT LYNAM, APP V PREMIER CRU & DES, RES
  1. ED91021 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LARRY TOWNS, JR., APP
  1. ED91134 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL R. JOHNSON, APP

JANUARY 20, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91187 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CLARENCE F WITHERBEE,

APP

  1. ED91287 HARRY SCHULTE, APP V SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CNTR,

RES

  1. ED91315 MICHAEL JACKSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91526 RICHARD CHAMBERLIN, RES V CITY OF ST LOUIS, APP

Related Opinions