OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED90313

Opinion

MARCH 17, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED90313 FRED L. HARRIS SR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED90371 PEGGY CARLISLE, RES V GEORGE CARLISLE, APP
  1. ED90488 IN RE: ROBERT CASTIGLIA
  1. ED91020 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V STEPHEN R FLANIGAN, APP
  1. ED91129 HAMID MAHMOODI, APP V WILLIAM HINES, RES
  1. ED91209 CHARLES DAILEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91264 DARIN PURNELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91352 DOMINIC HOGG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91415 JOHN WORRALL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91452 EIGHTEEN INVESTMENTS, RES V KCS, LLC, ET AL, APP
  1. ED91513 RICHARD WALTERS, APP V SECOND INJURY FUND, RES

MARCH 17, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91574 PATRICIA (MOORE) MIDDAUGH, APP V ALAN MOORE,

RES

  1. ED91607 CADLEROCK JOINT VENTURE, APP V CHRIS SARACINO,

RES

  1. ED91613 ADAM STEINBRUEGGE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91728 STEPHANIE PAMPKIN, APP V COTTMAN TRANSMISSION,

RES

  1. ED91751 DARYL RUCKER, APP V MICHAEL EBLING, ET AL, RES
  1. ED91789 DAVID JOHNSTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED90944 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LUKE BROWN, APP

Related Opinions