OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED90818

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

FEBRUARY 24, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED90818 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ALEXANDER NELSON, APP
  1. ED90903 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARIO SMITH, APP
  1. ED90913 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RODNEY E CUTTS, APP
  1. ED90948 ANGELA SCHUMER, APP V GARY SCHUMER, RES
  1. ED90954 WILLIE L. GIBBS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91072 LLOYD NEWSOM, APP V TAMARA NEWSOM, RES
  1. ED91079 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHNNY MOORE, APP
  1. ED91087 GARY RAY KAYE, APP V GEORGIA CAROL KAYE, RES
  1. ED91112 KENNETH R SKAGGS, JR., APP V DENISE R SKAGGS, RES
  1. ED91123 WM RIDGEWAY, MD, APP V WASHINGTON UNIV, ETAL,

RES

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91161 DEREK BOMAR, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED91178 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PURCELL HARTSON, APP
  1. ED91445 DELMAR DRUMMOND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91464 DANIEL J. FEATHER II, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91470 PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL, APP V LASERSURGE, INC., RES
  1. ED91594 TAMARA NICHOLS, ETAL,APP V BLAINE SAYRE, ETAL,RES
  1. ED91614 DEBRA DEROUSSE, APP V STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO,

RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED91377 NATHANIEL YOUNG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions