Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)
Decision date: UnknownED90818
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
FEBRUARY 24, 2009
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).
- ED90818 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ALEXANDER NELSON, APP
- ED90903 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARIO SMITH, APP
- ED90913 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RODNEY E CUTTS, APP
- ED90948 ANGELA SCHUMER, APP V GARY SCHUMER, RES
- ED90954 WILLIE L. GIBBS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED91072 LLOYD NEWSOM, APP V TAMARA NEWSOM, RES
- ED91079 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHNNY MOORE, APP
- ED91087 GARY RAY KAYE, APP V GEORGIA CAROL KAYE, RES
- ED91112 KENNETH R SKAGGS, JR., APP V DENISE R SKAGGS, RES
- ED91123 WM RIDGEWAY, MD, APP V WASHINGTON UNIV, ETAL,
RES
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).
- ED91161 DEREK BOMAR, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
- ED91178 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PURCELL HARTSON, APP
- ED91445 DELMAR DRUMMOND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED91464 DANIEL J. FEATHER II, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED91470 PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL, APP V LASERSURGE, INC., RES
- ED91594 TAMARA NICHOLS, ETAL,APP V BLAINE SAYRE, ETAL,RES
- ED91614 DEBRA DEROUSSE, APP V STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO,
RES
CORRECTION
- ED91377 NATHANIEL YOUNG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450