OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED90818

Opinion

FEBRUARY 24, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED90818 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ALEXANDER NELSON, APP
  1. ED90903 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARIO SMITH, APP
  1. ED90913 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RODNEY E CUTTS, APP
  1. ED90948 ANGELA SCHUMER, APP V GARY SCHUMER, RES
  1. ED90954 WILLIE L. GIBBS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91072 LLOYD NEWSOM, APP V TAMARA NEWSOM, RES
  1. ED91079 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHNNY MOORE, APP
  1. ED91087 GARY RAY KAYE, APP V GEORGIA CAROL KAYE, RES
  1. ED91112 KENNETH R SKAGGS, JR., APP V DENISE R SKAGGS, RES
  1. ED91123 WM RIDGEWAY, MD, APP V WASHINGTON UNIV, ETAL,

RES

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91161 DEREK BOMAR, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED91178 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PURCELL HARTSON, APP
  1. ED91445 DELMAR DRUMMOND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91464 DANIEL J. FEATHER II, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91470 PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL, APP V LASERSURGE, INC., RES
  1. ED91594 TAMARA NICHOLS, ETAL,APP V BLAINE SAYRE, ETAL,RES
  1. ED91614 DEBRA DEROUSSE, APP V STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO,

RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED91377 NATHANIEL YOUNG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions