Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED90832

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

APRIL 14, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED90832 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHON E TURNER, APP
  1. ED90866 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CHARLES A. TOLIVER, APP
  1. ED90872 WILFORD CARTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED90942 KENDRICK D WOODS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92068 MICHAEL WASHINGTON, PET V STEVE LARKINS, RES
  1. ED91106 KEN WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91122 JOHN HOWARD, RES V MARY ELLIOTT, APP
  1. ED91142 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RONALD JOSEPH, APP
  1. ED91273 CARL MITCHELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91285 WILLIE J. HAMILTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

APRIL 14, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91311 ANTWON WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91363 CARLA BOUCHERIE, APP V ULTRAFLO CORP & DES, RES
  1. ED91407 KAYLYN MCLEMORE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91803 JILL RAVENSCRAFT, APP V MARION COUNTY, RES
  1. ED91921 PAUL OLINGER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92130 DANIEL W. FOSTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92311 CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, RES V CARMEN HILL, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion