OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED90874

Opinion

APRIL 28, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED90874 JAMES E. BAILEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91180 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHENANDOAH GILLESPIE,

APP

  1. ED91240 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOSE A LUGOSCAMPOS, APP
  1. ED91241 OSMAN HALO, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91324 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ERIC HELM, APP
  1. ED91327 JOHNELL A. BELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91399 JAMES N. KELLEY, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91657 EARL HAYNES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91759 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CORREY J OWENS, APP
  1. ED91817 JANE DOE, RES V JAMES F. KEATHLEY, APP

APRIL 28, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91841 JIMMY L. TODD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91856 IN THE INTEREST OF: H.J. AND A.J.
  1. ED92066 CLARENCE CARTER, APP V TERMINIX, RES
  1. ED92206 M. GARY EPSTEIN, APP V MARION THOMPSON, RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED91457 JOHN JOSEPH EASTON, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE,

RES

Related Opinions