OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED90973

Opinion

NOVEMBER 10, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED90973 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARRIS M. HODGE, APP
  1. ED91871 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KATHERINE LINDSEY, APP
  1. ED91891 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V GREGORY L BONNETT, APP
  1. ED92162 KENNETH WEBB, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92359 MARVIN HAYES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92392 WAYNE ROGERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92398 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PAULA A. SMITH, APP
  1. ED92441 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KENNETH BAILEY, APP
  1. ED92449 THOMAS HEITKAMP, RES V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, APP
  1. ED92723 KATHERINE VOGEL, RES V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, APP

NOVEMBER 10, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92739 JOSEPH REIS, ET AL, APP V GREGORY REIS, ET AL, RES

CORRECTIONS

  1. ED91425 KRIS KOMSKY, ETAL, RES V UNION PACIFIC, ET AL, APP
  1. ED92319 GERALD BAMBERGER, APP V CHARLES FREEMAN, RES
  1. ED92500 DAVID PATRICK, RES V CITY OF JENNINGS, APP
  1. ED92639 LONNELL WALKER, APP V MO DEPT OF INSURANCE, RES

Related Opinions