OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91074

Opinion

MAY 19, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91074 DENNIS HOBSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91257 BEVERLY EDDY, APP V SHEILA ARMSTRONG, RES
  1. ED91435 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KERMIT P WILLIAMS, APP
  1. ED91519 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KEVIN J. BUCKNER, APP
  1. ED91595 LINDELL BANK AND TRUST, RES V DHP INVESTMENTS,

APP

  1. ED91641 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL J O'CONNOR, APP
  1. ED91670 JEROME MCDANIELS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91687 LEWIS ROBINSON, APP V JACQUELINE ROBINSON, RES
  1. ED91740 JASON S. LYNCH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91750 KEITH JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

MAY 19, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91798 CONNIE RAYBOURN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91972 SUSAN DWIGGINS, APP V CITY OF CHESTERFIELD, RES
  1. ED92016 JOHN DOE KK, APP V ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE,

RES

  1. ED92017 LONNIE SNELLING, APP V AMEREN UE, RES
  1. ED92071 RON J. GREGOR, RES V MICHAEL MODGLIN, APP
  1. ED92072 PAMELA J. TRAVERSEY, RES V MICHAEL MODGLIN, APP
  1. ED92098 JOY A. WILCOX, APP V M. DEAN WILCOX, RES

Related Opinions