OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91248

Opinion

JUNE 16, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91248 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN WILLIAMS, APP
  1. ED91367 CHAD K. FISK, RES V STEPHANIE P. FISK, APP
  1. ED91408 ANNA FRESHLEY, APP V DANIEL O'GORMAN, ET AL, RES
  1. ED91523 ISAIAH JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91656 EUGENE WALLACE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91659 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LINDELL BROWDEN, APP
  1. ED91712 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V REGINALD MOSES, APP
  1. ED91723 RICHARD S. BILAUSKI, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91791 STATE OFMISSOURI, RES V EARL D. SHOBE, JR., APP
  1. ED91801 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMES HITTLER, APP

JUNE 16, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91808 STATE OF MISSOURI RES, RES V MARQUES D.

MORRIS, AP

  1. ED91941 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V GENSUN JOHNSON, APP
  1. ED91948 RANDALL SMITH, RES V CARA CROSS, APP
  1. ED91985 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL L PHILLIPS, APP
  1. ED92161 KEITH LEWIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED91964 GREAT RIVERS ENVIRON, APP V CITY OF ST PETERS, RES

Related Opinions