OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91322

Opinion

JUNE 23, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91322 KEVIN BUTLER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91467 PRESTON TROTTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91520 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ALBERT L. CAMPBELL, APP
  1. ED91534 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD D. POWELL, APP
  1. ED91581 LAFAIR SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91653 JAMES CLAYTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91722 RICKY L. LANGLEY, JR., APP V SALINA M. LANGLEY,RES
  1. ED91758 JAVIER BARRETO, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91792 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL WEATHERS, II, APP
  1. ED91851 DAVID L. BRADLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

JUNE 23, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91864 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V STEVEN COLVIN, APP
  1. ED91940 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CARLOS BUFORD, APP
  1. ED92009 BRITTANY BINGAMAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92093 EDWARD DANTZSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92160 DEJUAN DAVIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92278 M&K CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, APP V MALLINCKRODT,

RES

Related Opinions