OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91325

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 29, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91325 ANTHONY HOWELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91880 STEVEN GOLET, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91898 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL L. BASS, APP
  1. ED92075 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SCOTT M. TURPIN, APP
  1. ED92230 JOE LEE DIXON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI , RES
  1. ED92331 JOAN BUEHLER, RES V KENNETH P SMITH, APP
  1. ED92435 KENNETH MITCHELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92516 TRUSTEE II, LLC, APP V PATRICK MARCIANTE, DFT
  1. ED92636 CITY OF SUNSET HILLS, RES V MARY B. WYMER, APP
  1. ED92648 JOY WILCOX, RES V M. DEAN WILCOX, APP
  1. ED92652 BERRYL L. BADER, APP V MATTHEW PADGETT, RES
  1. ED92667 JOHN MILTON, ET AL, APP V SSM ST. MARY'S, RES
  1. ED92888 ST OF MO EXREL MARY TRACY,RES V DAVID

LAUGHLIN,APP

Related Opinions