Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91437

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Criminal Law
Discuss a Similar Criminal Law Matter(314) 710-2740
View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

NOVEMBER 24, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91437 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL SHARKS, APP
  1. ED91531 TIMOTHY DICKENS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91769 GARY W. SIDES, APP V REGINA M. SIDES, RES
  1. ED92034 DWAN L. NOWDEN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92053 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PAUL S. WILSON, APP
  1. ED92228 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMES FEARS, APP
  1. ED92253 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WILLIAM T COLEMAN, APP
  1. ED92276 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V THOMAS P POTTEBAUM, APP
  1. ED92315 LARRY WALLACE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92375 ERNEST ROBISON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92611 DONALD HENRY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

NOVEMBER 24, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92643 DENNIS FOSTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92677 LARRY LEWIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92697 HARRY DILWORTH, APP V CITY OF BERKELEY, RES
  1. ED92708 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TYRONE HAMILTON, APP
  1. ED92726 MASONIC TEMPLE ASSOC, APP V COMPASS SQUARE,

RES

  1. ED92782 MARCELLA NOLLMAN, APP V BRENT RAWIE, RES
  1. ED92802 FREDERICK J. PEET, RES V MARQUIS FINANCIAL, APP
  1. ED92840 NICOLE HANSEN, APP V COVINGTON PLACE, L.P., RES
  1. ED92864 MICHAEL EDWARDS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92910 KATHLEEN ARNOLD, APP V CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,

RES

NOVEMBER 24, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92944 SULJO CUSKIC, APP V TRUE MANUFACTURING, INC.,

RES

  1. ED93082 DENNIS BAX, ET AL, APP V UNION ELECTRIC CO., RES
  1. ED91437 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL SHARKS, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830

remanded

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Call About This ClaimAsk About This Claim
Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion