OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91821

Opinion

OCTOBER 13, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91821 LAWRENCE MUELLER, AAP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED91827 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V UVONE M. WARD, APP
  1. ED91845 GLASGOW ENTERPRISES, RES V OSCAR BROOKS, APP
  1. ED91879 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V VESTER C. HERROD, APP
  1. ED91942 DEBORAH BLAISDELL, RES V RICHARD BLAISDELL, APP
  1. ED92064 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAVID EARL BOXLEY, APP
  1. ED92140 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PATRICK A OBERHART, APP
  1. ED92163 WILLIE HAMILTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92247 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JASON HENDRICKSON, APP
  1. ED92260 WILLIE SITTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

OCTOBER 13, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92294 KEVIN SIMPSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92323 ELIZABETH ANDERSON, APP V SARUE NAUERT, RES
  1. ED92369 RAY J. VINSON, APP V DEANNA DAUGHHETEE, RES
  1. ED92401 JIMMY POWELL, APP V LILLIE POWELL, RES
  1. ED92599 RONNIE R. FLECK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92665 THORNBURGH ABATEMENT, APP V J.W. TERRILL,

INC.,RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED91742 CAROLYNNE KIEFFER, APP V JENNIFER ICAZA, RES

Related Opinions