Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91858

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Criminal Law
Discuss a Similar Criminal Law Matter(314) 710-2740
View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

DECEMBER 15, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91858 TONY HARRIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92045 LAND CLEARANCE FOR REDEVEL,APP V ROY LEGENDRE,

RES

  1. ED92055 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARREN D ROBINSON, APP
  1. ED92170 PAULINA MUELLER, RES V DOUGLAS MUELLER, APP
  1. ED92182 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHNNY L. WILSON, APP
  1. ED92448 JOSEPH BATEK, ET AL, APP V STUMPF DEVELOPMENT,

RES

  1. ED92452 DONALD ROBERTS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92494 LORENZO PEEBLES, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED92511 DAVID PHILLIPS, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED92518 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANDRE PORTER, APP

DECEMBER 15, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92614 FISHER MORROW, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92689 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROY LEE WEST, APP
  1. ED92726 MASONIC TEMPLE ASSOC, APP V COMPASS SQUARE,

RES

  1. ED92754 STATE OF MISSOURI, APP V STEPHEN DELAGARZA, RES
  1. ED92814 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARCO MCROBERTS, APP
  1. ED92943 JAMES WILFORD, APP V ALLIED SYSTEMS, RES
  1. ED92961 RONNIE R. FLECK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92999 BRITTANY BOYD, APP V YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE,

RES

  1. ED93173 DAVID WASHINGTON, APP V COLOR ART OFFICE INT, RES
  1. ED93286 STANLEY BOYD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

DECEMBER 15, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

CORRECTION

  1. ED92635 OHM PROPERTIES, RES V CENTREC CARE, ET AL, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830

remanded

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Call About This ClaimAsk About This Claim
Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion