OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91858

Opinion

DECEMBER 15, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91858 TONY HARRIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92045 LAND CLEARANCE FOR REDEVEL,APP V ROY LEGENDRE,

RES

  1. ED92055 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARREN D ROBINSON, APP
  1. ED92170 PAULINA MUELLER, RES V DOUGLAS MUELLER, APP
  1. ED92182 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHNNY L. WILSON, APP
  1. ED92448 JOSEPH BATEK, ET AL, APP V STUMPF DEVELOPMENT,

RES

  1. ED92452 DONALD ROBERTS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92494 LORENZO PEEBLES, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED92511 DAVID PHILLIPS, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED92518 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANDRE PORTER, APP

DECEMBER 15, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92614 FISHER MORROW, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92689 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROY LEE WEST, APP
  1. ED92726 MASONIC TEMPLE ASSOC, APP V COMPASS SQUARE,

RES

  1. ED92754 STATE OF MISSOURI, APP V STEPHEN DELAGARZA, RES
  1. ED92814 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARCO MCROBERTS, APP
  1. ED92943 JAMES WILFORD, APP V ALLIED SYSTEMS, RES
  1. ED92961 RONNIE R. FLECK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92999 BRITTANY BOYD, APP V YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE,

RES

  1. ED93173 DAVID WASHINGTON, APP V COLOR ART OFFICE INT, RES
  1. ED93286 STANLEY BOYD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

DECEMBER 15, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

CORRECTION

  1. ED92635 OHM PROPERTIES, RES V CENTREC CARE, ET AL, APP

Related Opinions