Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91925

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

AUGUST 24, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91925 AVRIL SLAVIN, MD,APP V ST JOHN'S MERCY HEALTH,

RES

  1. ED93061 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANDREW GOODHART, APP
  1. ED93188 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHOHN METCALF, APP
  1. ED93318 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CHARLIE GENTRY, III, APP
  1. ED93408 COMMERCIAL REALTY, APP V CITIZENS NAT'L BANK, RES
  1. ED93488 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V OTHEL MOORE, APP
  1. ED93693 LEONARD JOSEPH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93718 JOHN MARKLE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93751 DON BEARD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93801 IN THE INTEREST OF X.H.

AUGUST 24, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93902 IN THE INTEREST OF: S.M.J.
  1. ED93931 CORRY ROBINSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94195 JOHN DUVALL, APP V ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MO, RES
  1. ED94302 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LORENZO JACKSON, APP
  1. ED94433 DONALD MCCLELLAND, APP V RUSSELL KRUSE, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion