OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED92476

Opinion

JUNE 15, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92476 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RUSSELL BRYANT, APP
  1. ED92970 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MELVIN CLARK, JR., APP
  1. ED93067 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CHARLES FARR, APP
  1. ED93180 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DONALD G COX, APP
  1. ED93244 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHONY COLE, APP
  1. ED93284 JERRY RACKLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93340 DERRICK PRUITT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93356 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN KOEHLER III, APP
  1. ED93368 GARY DETMER, ET AL, RES V OLD REPUBLIC TITLE, APP
  1. ED93453 KEVIN G. VARTY, RES V LINDA I. VARTY, APP

JUNE 15, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93497 TORK RODGERS, APP V GAINEY TRANSPORTATION,

RES

  1. ED93540 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROBERT L. GAMBLE, APP
  1. ED93579 NATHANIEL MCDANIEL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93698 TIMOTHY GALLAGHER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93868 JAMES HAMILTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93934 ERIC ROBINSON, APP V LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, RES
  1. ED93997 MARVA HILL, APP V SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, RES
  1. ED94003 THURSTON MITCHELL, APP V UNION PACIFIC RAIL, RES
  1. ED94048 ERIC R. MARSHALL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions