OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED92576

Opinion

NOVEMBER 16, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92576 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BRYAN E. COOMER, APP
  1. ED93021 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V HENRY L. FRAZIER, APP
  1. ED93671 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ERIC SWEARENGEN, APP
  1. ED93769 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARRYL BURSE, APP
  1. ED93877 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAVID L BLAKEMORE, APP
  1. ED93952 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTOINE L HAMILTON, APP
  1. ED93995 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V FREDERICK HOWARD, APP
  1. ED94010 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WILLIAM EDWARD CLAY, APP
  1. ED94013 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN TILLMAN, APP
  1. ED94047 EUGENE WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

NOVEMBER 16, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94168 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. CARLOS JACKSON JR.,

APP

  1. ED94173 WENDY HAMILTON, APP V GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE, RES
  1. ED94227 TIMOTHY E. TYLER, RES V MAUREEN ECKERT TYLER, APP
  1. ED94298 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LESTER MINNER, JR., APP
  1. ED94430 RODNEY CUTTS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94482 INCLINE VILLAGE BOARD, RES V FRANK ZIENER, APP
  1. ED94501 KEVIN DODD, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94596 KENNETH CARTER, APP V HUDSON SERVICES & DES, RES
  1. ED94863 DALE MORRISON, RES V MURPHY COMPANY, APP

Related Opinions