Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED92612

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

APRIL 20, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92612 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PATRICK MOORE, APP
  1. ED92715 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CORTEZ MCDOWELL, APP
  1. ED93136 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TARA L. LATHAM, APP
  1. ED93156 JAMES HERRON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93169 RUSSELL STEVENSON, APP V HOLLAND-BINKLEY CO, RES
  1. ED93358 ARMNADO GAMBOA-TAPIA, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED93431 JAMES CHAPMAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93458 RAQUEL WOODS, APP V EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., RES
  1. ED93461 KEVIN HARMAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93542 KENNETH ROBINSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

APRIL 20, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93574 CHARLENE HEMPHILL, APP V GATEWAY REGIONAL,

RES

  1. ED93657 JUSTIN DELANEY, APP V DIV OF EMPLOY SECURITY, RES
  1. ED93660 SEAN M. LIKE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED93765 ZACHARY STEPHENS, APP V BRANDY PETERS, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion