Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED92737

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92737 SEAN MATHIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93008 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ELIJAH HARRIS, APP
  1. ED93298 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MATTHEW E. WILSON, APP
  1. ED93301 MARLOW JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93489 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DOUGLAS HERVEY, APP
  1. ED93547 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARRYLE L. NOEL, APP
  1. ED93595 KENNETH ROUNDTREE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93692 ANTIONE JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93754 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARRELL J. ALEXANDER, APP
  1. ED93791 ANTOINE PEARSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93858 FRED PUESCHEL, APP V DIANE SUE PUESCHEL, RES
  1. ED93892 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ODIS AMMONS, APP
  1. ED93894 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DONNELL GLOVER, APP
  1. ED93954 MARY K. COTE, RES V GENE N. COTE, APP
  1. ED94043 CASSANDRA A. JONES, RES V. RANDY E. JONES, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion