OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED92737

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92737 SEAN MATHIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93008 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ELIJAH HARRIS, APP
  1. ED93298 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MATTHEW E. WILSON, APP
  1. ED93301 MARLOW JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93489 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DOUGLAS HERVEY, APP
  1. ED93547 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARRYLE L. NOEL, APP
  1. ED93595 KENNETH ROUNDTREE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93692 ANTIONE JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93754 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARRELL J. ALEXANDER, APP
  1. ED93791 ANTOINE PEARSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93858 FRED PUESCHEL, APP V DIANE SUE PUESCHEL, RES
  1. ED93892 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ODIS AMMONS, APP
  1. ED93894 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DONNELL GLOVER, APP
  1. ED93954 MARY K. COTE, RES V GENE N. COTE, APP
  1. ED94043 CASSANDRA A. JONES, RES V. RANDY E. JONES, APP

Related Opinions