Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED92755

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 07, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92755 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ALFRED LEE JONES, APP
  1. ED93327 DONALD J. LANGE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93328 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHONY L. ALLEN, APP
  1. ED93468 IN MATTER OF CARE AND TREATMENT OF ALBERT

BERNAT

  1. ED93590 CITY DARDENNE PRAIRIE, RES V CORA BOPP LTD, DFT
  1. ED93642 KENNETH SPLITT, RES V LOAN SPLITT, APP
  1. ED93648 IN THE ESTATE OF DORIS MELTNER
  1. ED93689 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. STEVEN L. WILKERSON, APP
  1. ED93720 IN THE INTEREST OF: L.L.M., L.M. & M.M.
  1. ED93793 JOHNNY P. MOORE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

SEPTEMBER 07, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93859 ARCHIE TIMES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93881 JEFFREY L. THURMAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94290 JANET WRIGHT, ET AL, RES V CITY OF PINE LAWN, APP
  1. ED94394 LONNIE SNELLING, APP V SAMUEL BECK, ET AL, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion