Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED93406

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 21, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93406 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CARLOS PERRY, APP
  1. ED93543 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MAURICE DAVENPORT, APP
  1. ED93736 MAURICE HOBSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93755 IN ESTATE OF ANNA BELL THIELE, APP V R THIELE, RES
  1. ED93814 MR GREEN JADE, APP V UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS,

RES

  1. ED93872 JAMES HUNT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93985 TRAVIS RATLIFF, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93992 REGINALD RILEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93994 GREGORY CHAMBERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94056 SCOTT D. PORTER, RES V DARLEEN A. PORTER, APP

SEPTEMBER 21, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94158 KANSAS CITY LIFE INS, RES V CARE STAFF, INC., DFT
  1. ED94238 DAVID MISSEY, SR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94385 GLASGOW ENTERPRISES, APP V OLD REPUBLIC

NATN'L,RES

  1. ED94403 MICHAEL MARTIN, APP V CITY OF ST ANN, RES
  1. ED94451 JEROME MORRIS-BEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94503 MYRON WEST, APP V PRINT PACK, INC., RES
  1. ED94535 TRACY WILD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion