Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED93740

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

NOVEMBER 09, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93740 TIMOTHY KALTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93991 ANTONIO ANDERSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94049 MORRIS HILL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94057 IN THE INTEREST OF: J.L.P., J.L.P. & K.P.
  1. ED94121 GATES ENTERPRISES, RES V CASH DEPO LLC, APP
  1. ED94151 MATTHEW SEYER, RES V BRIAN K. SIEVERS, ET AL, APP
  1. ED94332 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DENNIS SIMS, APP
  1. ED94436 MARVELLE PEARSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94469 KATHERINE TANURCHIS, APP V WESSEL INVESTMENTS,

RES

  1. ED95051 KARRIE JONES HARMON, RES V FRED ELMER JONES, APP

NOVEMBER 09, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

WITHDRAWN

  1. ED93221 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JEFFREY GARVEY, APP

CORRECTIONS

  1. ED93884 BRYAN K. MCDANIEL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94135 CITIZENS OF CRYSTAL CITY, APP V CRYSTAL CITY, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion