OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED93740

Opinion

NOVEMBER 09, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93740 TIMOTHY KALTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED93991 ANTONIO ANDERSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94049 MORRIS HILL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94057 IN THE INTEREST OF: J.L.P., J.L.P. & K.P.
  1. ED94121 GATES ENTERPRISES, RES V CASH DEPO LLC, APP
  1. ED94151 MATTHEW SEYER, RES V BRIAN K. SIEVERS, ET AL, APP
  1. ED94332 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DENNIS SIMS, APP
  1. ED94436 MARVELLE PEARSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94469 KATHERINE TANURCHIS, APP V WESSEL INVESTMENTS,

RES

  1. ED95051 KARRIE JONES HARMON, RES V FRED ELMER JONES, APP

NOVEMBER 09, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

WITHDRAWN

  1. ED93221 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JEFFREY GARVEY, APP

CORRECTIONS

  1. ED93884 BRYAN K. MCDANIEL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94135 CITIZENS OF CRYSTAL CITY, APP V CRYSTAL CITY, RES

Related Opinions