Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED93944

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

DECEMBER 14, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93944 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CARLOS VAUGHN, APP
  1. ED93965 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KERRY GREEN, APP
  1. ED94207 GLENN MANSFIELD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94228 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL OWENS, APP
  1. ED94241 WENDELL SIMMONS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94256 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARK BROOKS, APP
  1. ED94325 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHONY ANDERSON, APP
  1. ED94337 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CARL LUSS, APP
  1. ED94392 DARRYL SMALLWOOD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94552 JOHN HAIDUL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

DECEMBER 14, 2010

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94561 LONNIE SNELLING, APP V STL DEVELOPMENT CORP,

RES

  1. ED94634 ROBERT REINER, TRUSTEE, APP V CITY OF EUREKA, RES
  1. ED94737 STEVEN SMITH, ET AL, APP V J. ROCKNE CALHOUN, RES
  1. ED94763 CYNTHIA BAER, RES V STATE FARM MUTUAL, APP
  1. ED94804 DEBORAH SHEFFIELD, APP V TIP-TOP CLEANERS, RES
  1. ED95038 DEXTER LEWIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion