Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94198

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Criminal Law
Discuss a Similar Criminal Law Matter(314) 710-2740
View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

AUGUST 30, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94198 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WILLIAM BARMETTLER, APP
  1. ED94766 RAYMOND GLASS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94900 MO LAND DEVELOPMENT I, APP V MICHAEL LYON, RES
  1. ED94921 J.W., APP V E.S., RES
  1. ED95011 TREDELL WILKES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95136 STEFANIE L. BURGER, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED95175 OMARI JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95203 CAROLYNNE KIEFFER, APP V JENNIFER ICAZA, ETAL, RES
  1. ED95282 WESLEY WILLIAMS, APP V RUBY WILLIAMS, RES
  1. ED95287 GERMAN LOPEZ, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

AUGUST 30, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95306 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KELLY KING, APP
  1. ED95315 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTWONE IRVING, APP
  1. ED95319 CAREY TRAWICK, APP V BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, RES
  1. ED95347 LEROY STAINBACK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95592 KAVIN LEFLORE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95628 ELVIS BRANDON, JR, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95673 JOHN BUFF, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95795 JEFFREY BRIDWELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95807 SANDRA GENTRY, RES V KEITH E. GENTRY, APP
  1. ED95814 AARON L. WESLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

AUGUST 30, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95830 CHARLOTTE JOHN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95832 ST LOUIS COUNTY, RES V BRETT DARROW, APP
  1. ED95872 MICHAEL HOLLENBERG, APP V JAYNE DERBY, RES
  1. ED95877 IN THE INTEREST OF: Z.K.G.
  1. ED95908 ANTHONY STAFFORD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95989 NILGUN SACAKLI TRUST, APP V CITY OF ST LOUIS, RES

CORRECTIONS

  1. ED93686 DRURY CHESTERFIELD, RES V P MUEHLHEAUSLER, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830

remanded

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Call About This ClaimAsk About This Claim
Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion