OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94245

Opinion

APRIL 12, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94245 GREGORY FLENOID, APP V LENA Q. TATE, ET AL, RES
  1. ED94333 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DANEISHA WOODS, APP
  1. ED94497 M.H., RES V P.W., APP
  1. ED94507 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RANDOLPH L. STEVENS, APP
  1. ED94661 ROBERT L. STEWART, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94709 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BYRON K EDWARDS, APP
  1. ED94823 ISAIAH MARIN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94832 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CHRISTOPHER CARR, APP
  1. ED94839 LEONARD TAYLOR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94853 PURCELL HARTISON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

APRIL 12, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94929 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROY L. BURTON, APP
  1. ED95125 MICHAEL CARTER, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED95143 NICHOLE COWPER, RES V DONNIE JOHNSON, APP
  1. ED95213 GREGORY HUDSON, JR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95214 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V STEVEN WHITMORE, APP
  1. ED95454 IN THE INTEREST OF: A.R.F.

WITHDRAWN

ED94036 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROGER B. ASHBY, APP

Related Opinions