Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94320

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

OCTOBER 25, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94320 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAVID A. ATER, APP
  1. ED94895 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN DANIEL HAWKINS, APP
  1. ED95513 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DONALD K GIAMMANCO, APP
  1. ED95514 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD BOBBITT, APP
  1. ED95547 DAVID WADE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95620 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN DEBERRY, APP
  1. ED95810 LAWRENCE C. WOODS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95883 MARVIN J. NORMAN,APP V ANIMAL EMERGENCY

CLINIC,RES

  1. ED96092 KENNETH W BECK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96134 IN THE MATTER OF K.M., ET AL

OCTOBER 25, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96240 REGINALD J. RODGERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED96272 REBECCA LINDENAU, APP V ST LOUIS ARC, INC., RES
  1. ED96293 IN THE INTEREST OF: E.C.K. & C.E.G.K.
  1. ED96312 AFFIRMATIVE INS CO, RES V LONNELL WALKER, APP
  1. ED96484 NANCY COLABIANCHI, RES V THE HAIS GROUP, APP
  1. ED96566 KENNETH WILLIAMS,APP V MO DEPT SOCIAL

SERVICES,RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion