OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94320

Opinion

OCTOBER 25, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94320 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAVID A. ATER, APP
  1. ED94895 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN DANIEL HAWKINS, APP
  1. ED95513 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DONALD K GIAMMANCO, APP
  1. ED95514 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD BOBBITT, APP
  1. ED95547 DAVID WADE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95620 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN DEBERRY, APP
  1. ED95810 LAWRENCE C. WOODS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95883 MARVIN J. NORMAN,APP V ANIMAL EMERGENCY

CLINIC,RES

  1. ED96092 KENNETH W BECK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96134 IN THE MATTER OF K.M., ET AL

OCTOBER 25, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96240 REGINALD J. RODGERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED96272 REBECCA LINDENAU, APP V ST LOUIS ARC, INC., RES
  1. ED96293 IN THE INTEREST OF: E.C.K. & C.E.G.K.
  1. ED96312 AFFIRMATIVE INS CO, RES V LONNELL WALKER, APP
  1. ED96484 NANCY COLABIANCHI, RES V THE HAIS GROUP, APP
  1. ED96566 KENNETH WILLIAMS,APP V MO DEPT SOCIAL

SERVICES,RES

Related Opinions