Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94658

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

AUGUST 16, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94658 JOHNNY WIGGINS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95018 COLUMBUS SANDERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95220 DANIEL D. KRUEGER, APP V JOHN K. SUELTHAUS, RES
  1. ED95229 KARL A. RICHARD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95260 FREDERICK MAYS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95322 JAMES D. WILSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95323 COURTLAND REED, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95333 VINCENT MCFADDEN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95525 CHAD VICE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95548 COLLIN TRAMBLE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

AUGUST 16, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95583 ADAM BRAUER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95634 TERRELL PORK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95651 ANDREW MARTELLO, APP V MARIA VANDERKLOK, RES
  1. ED95837 LYNDON JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

WITHDRAWAL

  1. ED93686 DRURY CHESTERFIELD, RES V P MUEHLHEAUSLER, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion