OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94791

Opinion

NOVEMBER 8, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94791 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WANDA SPROAPS DAVIS,

APP

  1. ED95361 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KAMAL GASANOV, APP
  1. ED95380 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JUSTIN E WEBSTER, APP
  1. ED95381 DARNELL W. MOORE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95494 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JERRY D KLINKER, APP
  1. ED95578 JEFFREY MILLER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95623 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DANNY L SANDERS, APP
  1. ED95692 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMAAL H MUHAMMAD, APP
  1. ED95765 MARCO SAGITTO, APP V SEAN MCDONALD, RES
  1. ED95785 BYRON WHITESIDE, ETAL, RES V TERRY DUTTON, APP

NOVEMBER 8, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95951 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RONALD HEYL, APP
  1. ED96017 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V THOMAS WASHINGTON, APP
  1. ED96059 CHRISTOPHER SCHMITT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED96072 TRAVION WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96224 ANTHONY COLE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96265 ANTONIA RUSH-BANKS, APP V DIV EMPLOY SECURITY,

RES

  1. ED96294 IN THE INTEREST OF: C.W.L.L.
  1. ED96342 CHARLES S FOX, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96371 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL HARRIS, APP
  1. ED96589 KELLEY COURTNEY, APP V MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT,

RES

NOVEMBER 8, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96616 ALEC REPA, APP V REECE MASONRY, INC, RES
  1. ED96661 DANIEL W FOSTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions