OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94896

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 20, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94896 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CARJUAN D ADKINS, APP
  1. ED95096 CEDRIC C PERKINS III, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95148 DWAYNE YOUNG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95208 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WILLIAM E. TAYLOR, APP
  1. ED95246 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL I. BROOKS, APP
  1. ED95362 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JACOB T. JOHNSON, APP
  1. ED95477 JAMES SCHMEDEKE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95526 JAMES FROST, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95657 CARL DUNCAN, ET AL, RES V VARSITY GROUP, ET AL,APP
  1. ED95747 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V VINCENT HENDERSON, APP

SEPTEMBER 20, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95928 SCOTT TILLIS, APP V ST LOUIS METRO POLICE

DEPT,RES

  1. ED96078 JASON HENRICKSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96145 THEREASE BAKER-BELL, RES V LATHAM BELL, APP
  1. ED96147 ROBERT BROWN, APP V DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, RES
  1. ED96159 DEBORAH WHITEHORN, APP V STEAK N SHAKE, RES
  1. ED96164 A. J. S., RES V K. R.C., ET AL, APP
  1. ED96271 MISCHELLE WEIBLE, RES V MO BEVERAGE COMPANY,

APP

  1. ED96370 DAVID ORR, APP V JOE ARCAND, ET AL, RES
  1. ED96373 DONALD BERTRAM, APP V EXCELLENCE IN MO FOUND.,

RES

Related Opinions