OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95065

Opinion

NOVEMBER 15, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95065 ARTHUR SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95283 VICKI A. FLANIGAN, RES V DAVID W. FLANIGAN, APP
  1. ED95755 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V EARL RINGO, APP
  1. ED95794 DAVID BOXLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95990 DONNA KESSLER, RES V MONARCH FIRE PROT. DIST.,

APP

  1. ED96056 STATE OF MO, RES V ROY HANDLEY, APP
  1. ED96079 RICHARD HOLLORAN, APP V STL INVESTIGATIONS, RES
  1. ED96118 JEREMY L GOODSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96257 QUINTON C. BENSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96290 TAVIS DEAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

NOVEMBER 15, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96341 RAYMOND HINTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96418 WILBERT SHEPARD, APP V SECOND INJURY FUND, RES
  1. ED96475 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICKY CODY, APP
  1. ED96728 GREG MUNGER, APP V DIV OF EMPLOY SECURITY, RES
  1. ED96751 AMANDA LESTINA, RES V SECOND INJURY FUND, APP

Related Opinions