OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95227

Opinion

FEBRUARY 14, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95227 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAVID HIGGINS, APP
  1. ED95899 DON JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96005 CALVIN BAUGH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96068 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL HILL, APP
  1. ED96184 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ERIC HICKERSON, APP
  1. ED96345 ERIC HELM, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96346 GREGORY BONNETT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96483 DWAYNE WINGO, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96557 KERWIN SCOTT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96752 DONALD PULLUM, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96860 JAKE MITCHELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOUR, RES
  1. ED96895 SHEMIRA HAWKINS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96965 CARNELL HARTMAN, APP V. STATE OF MO, RES
  1. ED97071 CURTIS LAMMERT, APP V STATE OF MO, RES

Related Opinions