Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95393

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

DECEMBER 13, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95393 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TINA A RAY, APP
  1. ED95497 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MONTRELL R MOORE, APP
  1. ED95900 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V NATHAN J ALLEN, APP
  1. ED95911 JAYME NEAL-WALDROP, RES V BRAD WALDROP, APP
  1. ED95918 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V STEVEN HARRIS, APP
  1. ED95955 ST OF MISSOURI, RES V FREDERICK E CHRISTIAN, APP
  1. ED96070 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. NICHOLAS SAHNO, APP
  1. ED96146 BRAZILIA, LLC, RES V CATIE RENFROW, ET AL, APP
  1. ED96155 COREY J. OWENS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96222 DANNY PYATT, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES

DECEMBER 13, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96309 ANNA I. GRANT, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED96381 CORTEZ R. JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96404 TOMMIE LEE JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96555 STATE OF MO, RES V FELIX KEY, APP
  1. ED96657 JOHN H. SMITH, JR., APP V JAMES R. MONROE, JR.,RES
  1. ED96869 CRYSTAL WASHINGTON, APP V EMERSON PARK DEV.,

RES

  1. ED96998 STATE OF MISSOURI, APP V BILLY YOUNG, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion