Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95459

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

MARCH 13, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95459 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARROYL BUFFINGTON, APP
  1. ED95919 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL MATHEWS, APP
  1. ED96122 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V NELSON R VRANA, APP
  1. ED96192 JUDITH FINNEY, ET AL, RES V EBG HEALTH CARE I, APP
  1. ED96344 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WILLIAM T. HUNTLEY, APP
  1. ED96362 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTON FANTROY, APP
  1. ED96405 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARIO ROWELL, APP
  1. ED96520 ROBERT J. LEGENDRE, APP V STATE OF MO, RES
  1. ED96579 WILLIE J. ECHOLS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96810 FLOYD R. BENNETT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97128 ROGER RODERICK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97188 ROGER RODERICK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97199 MICHAEL KWIATKOWSKI,RES V ABS SUPPLY CO., INC.,APP

CORRECTIONS:

  1. ED95799 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DENNIS MCGINNIST, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion