Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95496

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

APRIL 10, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95496-01 ANTOINE KING, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95825 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SEAN K BUFORD, APP
  1. ED96477 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V OMORUYI N. OGASOGIE, APP
  1. ED96569 DARON L. DACE, APP V CATHY S. DACE, RES
  1. ED96584 JAMES D. MORGAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96640 CHRISTOPHER COLEMAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96863 STEVEN A HICKS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96914 JERRIKUA THOMAS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96933 DONALD CROSS, APP V DIV OF EMPLOY SECURITY, RES
  1. ED96970 ARION O'NEAL, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96971 JAMES HITTLER, APP V ST OF MO, RES
  1. ED96981 MICHAEL WELCH, APP V STATE OF MO, RES
  1. ED97036 CHRISTINE POWERS, RES V MARC A. POWERS, APP
  1. ED97404 ADELA OTTE, ET AL, APP V DEAN A. EDWARDS, SR., RES

WITHDRAWAL:

  1. ED96477 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V OMORUYI N. OGASOGIE, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion