Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED96433

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

APRIL 24, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96433 ANDREW BOEHM, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96637 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARYL DAVIS, APP
  1. ED96644 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TOMISLAV JURICIC, APP
  1. ED96671 HENRY CARMICAL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96797 MALLORY M. RUSH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96837 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN L. ALT, APP
  1. ED96877 NATIONAL CITY BANK, RES V NANCY FENDELL-LURIE, APP
  1. ED97087 EARL MILLER, APP V STATE OF MO, RES
  1. ED97107 PATRICK B. JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97124 JAMES RANDELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97145 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LUCRETIA BROOKE PYSE, APP
  1. ED97164 ANDRE SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97177 STERLING JEWELERS, RES V JUSTINE O WELLS-BLUE, APP
  1. ED97411 CALVIN WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97529 LORRIE GLOVER, APP V LIFE SKILLS FOUNDATION, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion