OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED96474

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96474 JEWELL SAUNDERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96757 CENTRAL CO EMERGENCY, RES V ENGINEERING EVAL,

APP

  1. ED96769 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WESTLEIGH E. ROBERTS,

APP

  1. ED96939 SUSAN REIFEISS, APP V ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL-PRES,RES
  1. ED96956 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARTIN L. KAMMEIER, APP
  1. ED97033 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RITCHIE W. MATHES, APP
  1. ED97245 DIONN TAYLOR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97381 MELDA DOLAN, APP V JAMES DOLAN, RES
  1. ED97511 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KERRY HOGAN, APP
  1. ED97538 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LARRY BETZEL, APP

OCTOBER 2, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED97601 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CHARLES KYLES, APP
  1. ED97731 ANNE HILLYER, APP V THOMAS E. KENNEDY, III, RES
  1. ED97790 MONIQUE SPANN-WADE, APP V MERRILL WADE, RES
  1. ED97824 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MAURICE D. SCOTT, SR.,APP
  1. ED97898 MARK T. SWIER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97902 DAVID HANG, APP V SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE, RES
  1. ED97996 LAURA NOBE, APP V. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED98081 KATIE BENEDICK, APP V SSM CARDIO, ET AL, RES
  1. ED98173 KAREN SWEENEY, APP V CINCINNATI LIFE INS. CO., RES

Related Opinions