St. Louis Counsel
OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED96772

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

OCTOBER 16, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96772 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHANTE M WRIGHT, APP
  1. ED96795 LANCE DRUDGE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96902 STEPHEN FLANIGAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97089 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY, RES V RHONDA WATZ, APP
  1. ED97228 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CLINTON WILLIAMS, APP
  1. ED97250 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ELIZABETH VANDEVEIRE,

APP

  1. ED97264 LOUIS T. WHITE, APP V ENCOMPASS INS COMPANY, RES
  1. ED97359 RONNIE MCCLELLAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97385 MICHAEL RIGGS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97472 1010 ST CHARLES UNIT, RES V KEMPER INVESTORS, APP

OCTOBER 16, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED97486 PAULA SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97491 ERIC FURLOW, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97691 STANLEY JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97707 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL HAYWOOD, APP
  1. ED97721 RITA NIKONOWICZ, RES V BERNARD DIFANI, APP
  1. ED97739 MARK A. STARKS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97866 IN THE INTEREST OF: M.L.D. & C.G.D.
  1. ED97937 K. MCMENAMY, APP V SSM HEALTH CARE STL & DES, RES
  1. ED98028 GLENN HOLMES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98032 EDWARD L. BROWN, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

OCTOBER 16, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98083 CAPLACO TWELVE, INC., APP V REWAN AMEDI, RES
  1. ED98178 STEVEN HALPER, RES V. KAREN HALPER, APP

CORRECTION(S):

  1. ED98024 IN ESTATE OF A.T., A MINOR CHILD

Related Opinions

John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830

remanded

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

othermajority12,101 words

Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329

remanded
othermajority791 words

Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189

reversed
othermajority970 words

Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985

reversed
othermajority1,629 words

MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450

affirmed
othermajority1,028 words