Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED96830

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 4, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96830 JEREMY CLEVELAND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96900 LVNV FUNDING, LLC, RES V CAROL LAMPKINS, APP
  1. ED96972 STATE OF MO, RES V. DAVID R. FUGATE, APP
  1. ED96986 STATE OF MO, RES V ROBERT E. ADAMS, APP
  1. ED97023 JAMES HEMPHILL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97097 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V VIRGIL A. STALLONE, APP
  1. ED97253 ELIZABETH JORDAN, RES/CRSAP V ST JOHN'S MERCY, APP
  1. ED97301 MELVIN FORD, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97347 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DEWAYNE WHITE, APP
  1. ED97492 DARRELL ALEXANDER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97569 JOHN GUIDRY, RES/CRS-APP V SEVEN TRAILS WEST, APP
  1. ED97727 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V REGINALD WILLIAMS, APP
  1. ED97735 CARLOS HOOKS, APP V HOLIDAY INN, RES
  1. ED97747 DARLENE WINCH, APP V PERRY OAKS MANOR, RES
  1. ED97925 PATRICK D. MOORE, JR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98019 FREDRICK NELSON, APP V NORDSTROM, INC. & DES, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion