OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED97221

Opinion

OCTOBER 23, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED97221 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JERRY RUTLIN, APP
  1. ED97283 EDDIE CROSS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97503 WAYNE MCCLINTOCK, JR., RES V GREGORY FENLON, APP
  1. ED97531 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD M. CREWS, APP
  1. ED97556 CASEY HOLLINS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97711 STEFANIE OLSON, APP V BANK OF AMERICA, RES
  1. ED97723 ALFRED JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97743 IN MATTER OF CARE & TREATMENT OF RICHARD

BRADLEY

  1. ED97817 KERRY GREEN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97887 IN THE INTEREST OF: A.R., ET AL

OCTOBER 23, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED97986 TIMOTHY HOOSIER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98000 DON & KAREN DOLL, APP V. W.C. & EILEEN KISER, RES
  1. ED98138 ANTONIO HOWARD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98197 STANLEY CHUBB, APP V. ROBINSON CONST., CO., RES
  1. ED98323 WALTER GLANZ, APP V. CITY OF ST. LOUIS & SIF, RES
  1. ED98328 L. REEVES, ET AL, APP V PARKSIDE TOWERS, ET AL,RES

Related Opinions